Strategies and Performance

Willingdon Views

04/18/17: Viral, whatever...
Too often our first reaction to something strange happening isn’t to intervene, or offer a…
Today, we seem preoccupied with unyielding special interests, narrow viewpoints, and stubborn political posturing, but…
Two legendary champions played an epic tennis match at the Australian Open, and the winner…

Stay Informed

Sign up for Willingdon Views



Current Strategy

top 10 individual stock holdings
Costco Corp. Dycom Industries
Apple Inc. Becton Dickinson
Google Blackrock Inc.
Walt Disney Co. Marriott Intl.
Financial Sector ETF S&P Mid-Cap Index

Technology, Materials, and Consumer Discretionary stocks have led the overall stock market thus far in 2017. Energy and Telecom have been the two worse performing sectors year-to-date. In general, earnings reports for the 4th quarter show an economy that continues to grow very slowly, while corporations eagerly await two potentially very important catalysts for a better economic environment. These two are lower taxes and less government regulation. The new administration is working toward both of these objectives, but the process is not linear, will be frustrating to watch, and has many potential outcomes. President Trump is undoubtedly unlike any president we have had in a very long time, and he isn't playing by conventional political rules, which frustrates both sides of the aisle. Only time will tell whether his game-changing approach will result in faster economic growth for the U.S., which is his primary goal. In the meantime, our strategy is to take advantage of the continued volatility in order to either take profits in current holdings or find undervalued stocks to buy. Discipline and patience will be crucial during these uncertain and volatile times. Over time, we will search for more sustainable trends of which to take advantage in our stock selection process. While there is certainly reason for optimism regarding the growth potential of the economy and stock market with a "business-friendly" administration in place, much depends on their ability to accomplish the task before them.

core equity strategy

We utilize a time-tested, three-stage process for constructing equity portfolios. Our analysis is top-down driven with a strong emphasis on identifying quality based on peer-to-peer analysis in each industry and sector. Portfolios typically include 30 – 35 stocks.

stage 1: qualitative analysis

We define quality as the sustainable competitive advantage a company enjoys over its competition. We have a checklist to assess competitive advantage including the following variables: product, price, service, management, cost position, market position, financial strength, strategic planning, technology, and execution. This is a dynamic process whereby different variables are given greater weight in some industries while given lesser weight in others. The key is to determine the critical driving forces in each industry in order to accurately assess the relative competitive advantages that each company may possess.

stage 2: top-down analysis

We identify long-term market drivers, or secular trends, which determine the sectors of the market likely to outperform and those likely to underperform the overall market. Based on this analysis we will position portfolios to hold a larger or smaller position in relation to the sector weights in the S&P 500.

stage 3: quantitative analysis

We utilize industry specific valuation methodologies to determine the upside and downside potential for stocks that pass our qualitative screens.Typically this involves approximately 200 companies. Valuation parameters include: Price/Earnings (PE), Price/Cash Flow (PCF), Price to Growth (PEG), and Price/Book Value (PBV).


We are continually retesting each holding in the portfolio in the context of our three-step investment process. We continually challenge our qualitative assessment as the competitive landscape changes in response to the economy or other market forces. Likewise, we review our overall top-down strategy on an ongoing basis through the various stages of the economic cycle. Lastly, through our quantitative valuation models we monitor the relative upside and downside of each individual stock in the portfolio.

Our sell discipline flows from our three-step process as follows: First, if the company loses its quality – no longer has a sustainable competitive advantage vs. its competition it would be a candidate for sale. Second, a change in our top-down strategy may lead to increasing exposure in one sector and reducing exposure in another sector. Third, if a stock becomes over-valued based on our valuation analysis it may be a candidate for sale.

Diversified Portfolios

Our focus on high quality, industry leading companies results in a well-diversified portfolio of global corporations. In today’s global economy, strong companies must compete on a worldwide platform. As a result, we analyze investment trends and search for opportunities not only within the U.S., but also in international and emerging markets.  Many of the holdings in our core portfolio generate more than 50% of sales outside of the United States.  

Our focus on industry leaders often leads to opportunities in small cap and mid cap companies.  This balance of large cap, mid cap, small cap, international, and emerging markets provides solid diversification and growth opportunities for our clients. 

This investment strategy is not a recommendation to buy or sell any of the securities mentioned.  Past performance is not a guarantee of future results.